DEL RIO v. DESOUSA

Filing 12

ORDER OF DISMISSAL - ADOPTING 10 Report and Recommendation,. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/12/13. (Clerk to enter judgment) (deb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION NORBERTO DEL RIO, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:13-cv-548-MW/CAS NEIL DESOUSA, U.S. Marshall; PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General; KATHERINE FERNANDEZ RUNDLE, Statewide Prosecutor; and MICHAEL D. CREWS, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Defendants. __________________________/ ORDER OF DISMISSAL This Court has considered, without hearing, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate, ECF No. 10, filed November 22, 2013, along with the Plaintiff’s “request” to dismiss the complaint, ECF No. 11, filed December 5, 2013. Subsequent to the filing of the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff filed his motion to dismiss the complaint. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(i), if an adverse party has not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment, a plaintiff is entitled to dismiss an action without order of court. A plaintiff properly effects such a dismissal by filing a “notice of dismissal.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(i). Although Plaintiff has 1 designated his filing as a “request” to dismiss, this Court notes that no answer or motion for summary judgment has been filed by the Defendants and Plaintiff is entitled to dismiss his action as a matter of right. This Court construes the “request” to dismiss as a “notice” of dismissal within the meaning of Rule 41. For these reasons, it is ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(i).” The Clerk shall close the file. SO ORDERED on December 12, 2013. s/Mark E. Walker United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?