JOHNSON v. JUDGE
Filing
5
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "This case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A because the Complaint is frivolous and Plaintiff seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from suit. This dismissal will count as a "strike" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). If Plaintiff accumulates three strikes, Plaintiff shall be barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in a civil case in federal court, absent a showing that Plaintiff is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)." The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 4/22/2014. (tdl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
ULYSSES JOHNSON,
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 4:14-cv-120-MW/GRJ
JUDGE L/N/U, SECOND JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT COURT,
Respondent.
______________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
The Court has considered the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation,
ECF No.3, filed April 2, 2014.
Upon consideration, no objection having been
filed by the Plaintiff,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the Court’s
opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "This case is DISMISSED with
prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A because the Complaint is frivolous and
Plaintiff seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from suit. This
dismissal will count as a "strike" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). If Plaintiff
1
accumulates three strikes, Plaintiff shall be barred from proceeding in forma
pauperis in a civil case in federal court, absent a showing that Plaintiff is under
imminent danger of serious physical injury, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)."
The Clerk shall close the file.
SO ORDERED on April 22, 2014.
s/Mark E. Walker
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?