MILLER v. MAINLINE INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC
Filing
6
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL - Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 4 , is DENIED as moot. The clerk must enter judgment stating, "The parties are ordered tocomply with their settlement agreement. The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the order to comply with the settlement agreement. All claims in this case are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41." Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 5/19/2014. (dlt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
DEANNA MILLER,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 4:14cv179
MAINLINE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
INC., a Florida Corporation,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
Plaintiff has filed a notice, ECF No. 5, indicating that this case has been
settled. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The parties must comply with their settlement agreement.
2. All claims other than for enforcement of the settlement agreement are
voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.
3. Jurisdiction is retained to enforce the order to comply with the settlement
agreement.
4. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 4, is DENIED as moot.
1
5. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The parties are ordered to
comply with their settlement agreement. The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce
the order to comply with the settlement agreement. All claims in this case are
voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.”
6. The clerk must close the file.
7. A party who objects to the terms of this order or the judgment to be
entered based on this order must file a timely motion to alter or amend under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e).
SO ORDERED on May 19, 2014.
s/Mark E. Walker
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?