THARPE v. CREWS
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 26 ) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order. The petitioner's petit ion for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1 ) is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "Petitioner's § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED." A certificate of appealability and leave to appeal in forma pauperis are DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 1/3/2017. (cle)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
HUBERT THARPE,
Petitioner,
v.
4:14cv263–WS/CAS
JULIE L. JONES, Secretary,
Florida Department of Corrections,
Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.
26) docketed November 22, 2016. The magistrate judge recommends that the
petitioner’s § 2254 petition (doc. 1) be denied. The petitioner has filed no
objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.
Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, this
court has determined that the magistrate judge correctly determined that the
petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
Page 2 of 2
1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 26) is hereby
ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.
2. The petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.
3. This action is DISMISSED.
4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “Petitioner’s § 2254 petition for
writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED.
5. A certificate of appealability and leave to appeal in forma pauperis are
DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this
3rd
day of
January
, 2017.
s/ William Stafford
WILLIAM STAFFORD
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?