ROLLE v. ENGLES et al.

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the courts opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk must close the file. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 9/2/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Order of Dismissal re: earlier case) (dac)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:14cv342-RH/CAS BRIAN ENGLES, NICOLE RAYSOR et al., Defendants. ___________________________/ ORDER OF DISMISSAL This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, ECF No. 5 and the objections, ECF No. 6. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. The report and recommendation is correct and is adopted as the court’s opinion. The complaint is unfounded on the merits because it names defendants who are immune, are not suable entities, or against whom the complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The claims are barred by res judicata because an earlier complaint against the same defendants arising from the same events and asserting the same claims was dismissed for the same reasons. And the Case No. 4:14cv342-RH/CAS Page 2 of 2 claims are barred by the statute of limitations. A copy of the order dismissing the earlier case and directing the entry of judgment—and explaining the basis for the decision—is attached to this order. For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is dismissed with prejudice.” The clerk must close the file. SO ORDERED on September 2, 2014. s/Robert L. Hinkle United States District Judge Case No. 4:14cv342-RH/CAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?