YOUNG v. HODGSON

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGESREPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The magistrate judges report and recommendation (doc. 16 ) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. The plaintiff's motion (doc. 14 ) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis onappeal is DENIED. Construed as a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, the motion (doc. 14 ) is DENIED. The clerk shall forward a copy of document 15 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 4/13/2015. (dac)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION DARRYL MAURICE YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. 4:14cv528-WS C. HODGSON, Defendant. ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 16) docketed March 11, 2015. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's motion (doc. 14) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be denied. The plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and recommendation. The court has reviewed the record and has determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: Page 2 of 2 1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 16) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The plaintiff's motion (doc. 14) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED. 3. Construed as a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, the motion (doc. 14) is DENIED. 4. The clerk shall forward a copy of document 15 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of April , 2015. s/ William Stafford WILLIAM STAFFORD SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?