GAFFNEY v. CORIZON HEALTH INC

Filing 110

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL, re: 109 NOTICE of Settlement. The Clerk must enter judgment stating, "The parties are ordered to comply with their settlement agreement. The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the order to comply wi th the settlement agreement. All claims in this case are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41." The Clerk must close the file and cancel the hearing set for Friday, March 10, 2017, at 3:30 p.m. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 3/9/2017. (kjw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION JOHNNY R. GAFFNEY, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 4:15cv349-MW/CAS CORIZON HEALTH, INC., et al., Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER FOR DISMISSAL Plaintiff has filed his Notice of Settlement, ECF No. 109. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties must comply with their settlement agreement. 2. All claims other than for enforcement of the settlement agreement are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. 3. Jurisdiction is retained to enforce the order to comply with the settlement agreement. 4. The Clerk must enter judgment stating, “The parties are ordered to comply with their settlement agreement. The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the order to comply with the settlement agreement. All claims in this case are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.” 1 5. The Clerk must close the file and cancel the hearing set for Friday, March 10, 2017, at 3:30 p.m. 6. A party who objects to the terms of this order or the judgment to be entered based on this order must file a timely motion to alter or amend under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). SO ORDERED on March 9, 2017. s/Mark E. Walker ____ United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?