EVANS v. JONES

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 15 ) is GRANTED. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 23 ) is hereby ADOPTED and incorp orated by reference into this order. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice." A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 2/28/2017. (cle)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION SAM EVANS, JR., Petitioner, v. 4:15cv506–WS/GRJ SECRETARY, DEP’T OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 23) docketed January 11, 2017. The magistrate judge recommends that the petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as time-barred. The petitioner has filed no objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Upon review of the record, the court has determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: Page 2 of 2 1. The respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 15) is GRANTED. 2. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 23) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order. 3. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred. 4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice." 5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of February , 2017. s/ William Stafford WILLIAM STAFFORD SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE5.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?