HAYES v. ONG et al

Filing 80

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 79 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Ong, ECF No. 63 , is GRANTED. The summary judgment motion filed by Plaintiff, ECF No. 64 , is DENIED. The summary ju dgment motion filed by Defendants Bucarelli, Lee, Campbell, and Winree, ECF No. 66 , is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claim against Dr. Delacerna is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) for failure to serve the Defendant with process. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Plaintiff's claims against Defendants are dismissed." The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 9/28/2017. (vkm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION DAMIEN CHRISTOPHER HAYES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 4:16cv28-MW/CAS DR. FRANCIS ONG, et al., Defendants. ___________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Second Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 79. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties, IT IS ORDERED: The second report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s opinion. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Ong, ECF No. 63, is GRANTED. The summary judgment motion filed by Plaintiff, ECF No. 64, is DENIED. The summary judgment motion filed by Defendants Bucarelli, Lee, Campbell, and Winree, ECF No. 66, is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claim against Dr. Delacerna is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) for failure to serve the Defendant with process. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, 1 “Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants are dismissed.” The Clerk shall close the file. SO ORDERED on September 28, 2017. s/Mark E. Walker ____ United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?