DAVIS v. JONES

Filing 42

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The Clerk shall enter judgment stating the following: The Respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 26 , is GRANTED. Petitioner's motion to stay this case, EC F No. 32 , is DENIED. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1 , challenging the judgment of conviction and sentences in State of Florida v. Dionte Jermaine Davis, Madison County Circuit Court Case No. 10-CF-98, is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 10/27/2017. (vkm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Case No. 4:16cv401-MW/CJK FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY, Respondent. ___________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 33, and has also reviewed de novo Petitioner’s timely objections to the report and recommendation. ECF No. 40. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Petitioner’s objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating the following: 1. The Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 26, is GRANTED. 2. Petitioner’s motion to stay this case, ECF No. 32, is DENIED. 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, challenging the judgment of conviction and sentences in State of Florida v. Dionte Jermaine 1 Davis, Madison County Circuit Court Case No. 10-CF-98, is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 5. The Clerk shall close the file. SO ORDERED on October 27, 2017. s/Mark E. Walker ____ United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?