TAYLOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

Filing 30

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. The motion to dismiss filed by the Department of Corrections, ECF No. 11 , and the motion to dismiss by Corizon, ECF No. 4 , are GRANTED. Plaintiffs amended complaint, ECF No. 13 , is DISMISSED. However, Plaintiff is permitted to file a second amended complaint in compliance with the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff must file his second amended complaint on or before 5/10/2017, or this cause will be dismissed. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 4/10/2017. (vkm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION LEONARD WAYNE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 4:16cv491-MW/CAS FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. ___________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 27 Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties,1 IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s opinion. The motion to dismiss filed by the Department of Corrections, ECF No. 11, and the motion to dismiss by Corizon, ECF No. 4, are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s amended complaint, ECF No. 13, is DISMISSED. However, Plaintiff is permitted to file a second amended complaint in compliance with the Report 1 Plaintiff sought and received an extension of time to March 31, 2017, in which to file objections to the report and recommendation. Plaintiff failed to file any objections. 1 and Recommendation. Plaintiff must file his second amended complaint on or before May 10, 2017, or this cause will be dismissed. SO ORDERED on April 10, 2017. s/Mark E. Walker ____ United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?