TAYLOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Filing
30
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. The motion to dismiss filed by the Department of Corrections, ECF No. 11 , and the motion to dismiss by Corizon, ECF No. 4 , are GRANTED. Plaintiffs amended complaint, ECF No. 13 , is DISMISSED. However, Plaintiff is permitted to file a second amended complaint in compliance with the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff must file his second amended complaint on or before 5/10/2017, or this cause will be dismissed. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 4/10/2017. (vkm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
LEONARD WAYNE TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 4:16cv491-MW/CAS
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report
and Recommendation. ECF No. 27 Upon consideration, no objections having
been filed by the parties,1
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s
opinion. The motion to dismiss filed by the Department of Corrections, ECF No.
11, and the motion to dismiss by Corizon, ECF No. 4, are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s
amended complaint, ECF No. 13, is DISMISSED. However, Plaintiff is
permitted to file a second amended complaint in compliance with the Report
1
Plaintiff sought and received an extension of time to March 31, 2017, in which to file objections to the report and
recommendation. Plaintiff failed to file any objections.
1
and Recommendation. Plaintiff must file his second amended complaint on or
before May 10, 2017, or this cause will be dismissed.
SO ORDERED on April 10, 2017.
s/Mark E. Walker
____
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?