HOLMES v. ARC BIG BEND

Filing 16

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL. The plaintiff has filed a notice indicating that this case has been settled. ECF No. 15 . The clerk must enter judgment stating, "The parties are ordered to comply with their settlement agreement. The c ourt reserves jurisdiction to enforce the order to comply with the settlement agreement. All claims in this case are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41." The clerk must close the file. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 6/17/2017. (kjw)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION ALEX TYRONE HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:16cv688-RH/CAS THE ARC BIG BEND, Defendant. _______________________________/ ORDER FOR DISMISSAL The plaintiff has filed a notice indicating that this case has been settled. ECF No. 15. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties must comply with their settlement agreement. 2. All claims other than for enforcement of the settlement agreement are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. 3. Jurisdiction is retained to enforce the order to comply with the settlement agreement. 4. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The parties are ordered to comply with their settlement agreement. The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the Case No. 4:16cv688-RH/CAS Page 2 of 2 order to comply with the settlement agreement. All claims in this case are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.” 5. The clerk must close the file. 6. A party who objects to the terms of this order or the judgment to be entered based on this order must file a timely motion to alter or amend under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). SO ORDERED on June 17, 2017. s/Robert L. Hinkle United States District Judge Case No. 4:16cv688-RH/CAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?