LEWIS v. SCOTT

Filing 34

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, ECF No. 12 , is DENIED. The Order entered December 7, 2016, ECF No . 10 , is VACATED and this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 27 and motion for review, ECF No. 28 , are DENIED. The Clerk shall note on the docket this case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)." The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 6/12/2017. (tdl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION JONATHAN LEWIS, #221501395, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 4:16cv715-MW/CAS RICK SCOTT, Defendant. ___________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 30. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties,1 IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, ECF No. 12, is DENIED. The Order entered December 7, 2016, ECF No. 10, is VACATED and this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1 On May 19, 2017, Plaintiff was granted an extension of time to June 5, 2017, in which to file objections to the report and recommendation. ECF No. 32. Plaintiff has failed to do so. 1 § 1915(g). Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 27 and motion for review, ECF No. 28, are DENIED. The Clerk shall note on the docket this case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).” The Clerk shall close the file. SO ORDERED on June 12, 2017. s/Mark E. Walker ____ United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?