PITTMAN v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 4 ) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. The plaintiff's Emergenc y Motion for Preliminary/Temporary Injunction (doc. 1 ) and this action are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are dismissed." The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2 ) is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 3/7/2017. (cle)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION RANDY D. PITTMAN, Plaintiff, v. 4:17cv66–WS/CAS FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 4) docketed February 3, 2017. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's case be dismissed for failure to state a claim. The plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and recommendation. The court has reviewed the record and has determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: Page 2 of 2 1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 4) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Preliminary/Temporary Injunction (doc. 1) and this action are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “All claims are dismissed.” 4. The plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of March , 2017. s/ William Stafford WILLIAM STAFFORD SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?