SISKOS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Filing 45

ORDER OF DISMISSAL (re: 42 Report and Recommendation, 44 Objection to Report and Recommendation, and 43 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend) - The report and recommendation is accepted. The second amended complaint is dismissed. The plaintiff may file a third amended complaint by 6/28/2018. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 5/30/2018. (ckm)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION WILLIAM JAMES SISKOS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:17cv186-RH/GRJ SECRETARY, DEP’T OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. _____________________________/ ORDER OF DISMISSAL This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, ECF No. 42, the objections, ECF No. 44, and the plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. The report and recommendation correctly concludes that the second amended complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. This order accepts the recommendation and dismisses the second amended complaint. The motion for leave to file a third amended complaint does not include allegations that would cure the deficiency. But this order gives the plaintiff leave to file a third Case No. 4:17cv186-RH/GRJ Page 2 of 2 amended complaint. If the third amended complaint is deficient, judgment will be entered; the plaintiff should not expect to be granted leave to file a fourth amended complaint. For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The report and recommendation is accepted. 2. The second amended complaint is dismissed. 3. The plaintiff may file a third amended complaint by June 28, 2018. SO ORDERED on May 30, 2018. s/Robert L. Hinkle United States District Judge Case No. 4:17cv186-RH/GRJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?