ALSTON v. BELLAMY
Filing
10
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The 4 report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff's objections, as this Court's opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Plaintiff's C omplaint, ECF No. 1 , is DISMISSED without prejudice as malicious for abuse of the judicial process. The dismissal of this case as malicious shall operate as a "strike" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The motion for leave to proceed as a pauper, ECF No. 2 , is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Permission for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, ECF No. 8 , is DENIED. Plaintiff's second motion for leave to proceed as a pauper, ECF No. 9 , is DENIED." The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 8/25/2017. (vkm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
OMAR T. ALSTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 4:17cv330-MW/GRJ
E. BELLAMY,
Defendant.
___________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, ECF No. 4, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections
to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 7. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff's
objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating,
“Plaintiff’s Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED without prejudice as malicious
for abuse of the judicial process. The dismissal of this case as malicious shall operate
as a “strike” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The motion for leave to proceed as a
pauper, ECF No. 2, is DENIED. Plaintiff’s Motion Requesting Permission for
1
Leave to File an Amended Complaint, ECF No. 8, is DENIED. Plaintiff’s second
motion for leave to proceed as a pauper, ECF No. 9, is DENIED.” The Clerk shall
close the file.
SO ORDERED on August 25, 2017.
s/Mark E. Walker
____
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?