HILL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Filing
26
ORDER DENYING 13 PETITIONER'S AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 24 ) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "Petitioner's amended petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED." A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Leave to proceed on appeal is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 10/09/2019. (toy)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
JONATHAN RAWSHIELD HILL,
Petitioner,
v.
4:19cv95–WS/EMT
MARK S. INCH,
Respondent.
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S AMENDED
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF
No. 24) docketed September 5, 2019. The magistrate judge recommends that
Petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED. Petitioner has
filed objections (ECF No. 25) to the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation, and those objections have been carefully reviewed by the
undersigned.
Upon review of the record in light of Petitioner’s objections, the court has
determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be
Page 2 of 2
adopted. Like the magistrate judge, the undersigned finds that Petitioner has failed
to show that he is entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 24) is
hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.
2. Petitioner's amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 13) is
DENIED.
3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "Petitioner's amended petition for
writ of habeas corpus is DENIED."
4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
5. Leave to proceed on appeal is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this
9th
day of
October
, 2019.
s/ William Stafford
WILLIAM STAFFORD
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?