EDWARDS v. BARR et al
Filing
12
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 11 ) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order of the court. Petitioner's pet ition (ECF No. 1 ) for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED. Petitioner shall be immediately released from custody upon conditions of supervision pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(3). The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "Kevin Edwards's petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted." Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 11/17/20. (blb)
Case 4:20-cv-00350-WS-MAF Document 12 Filed 11/17/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
KEVIN EDWARDS,
A# 075–002–549,
Petitioner,
v.
4:20cv350–WS/MAF
WILLIAM P. BARR, et al.,
Respondents.
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S PETITION
FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF
No. 11) docketed October 14, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that
Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus be granted. No objections to the
report and recommendation have been filed.
The court having reviewed the report and recommendation, it is ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 11) is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.
2. Petitioner’s petition (ECF No. 1) for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED.
Case 4:20-cv-00350-WS-MAF Document 12 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2
3. Petitioner shall be immediately released from custody upon conditions of
supervision pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(3).
4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “Kevin Edwards’s petition for writ
of habeas corpus is granted.”
DONE AND ORDERED this
17th
day of
November
, 2020.
s/ William Stafford
WILLIAM STAFFORD
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?