LAGRANDEUR v. STOKES et al
Filing
8
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The report and recommendation, ECF No. #7 , is accepted and adopted as this Courts opinion. Plaintiffs in forma pauperis motion, ECF No. #6 , and his prior consent form, ECF No. 2, are DENIED. Plaintiff must pay the filing fee on or before October 12, 2021. This case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with this Order. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 9/9/2021. (rcb)
Case 4:21-cv-00294-MW-MAF Document 8 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
JEFFREY LAGRANDEUR,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No.: 4:21cv294-MW/MAF
LT. J. STOKES, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report
and Recommendation. ECF No. 7. Upon consideration, no objections having been
filed by the parties,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation, ECF No. 7, is accepted and adopted as this
Court’s opinion. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis motion, ECF No. 6, and his prior
consent form, ECF No. 2, are DENIED. Plaintiff must pay the filing fee on or before
October 12, 2021. This case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further
Case 4:21-cv-00294-MW-MAF Document 8 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 2
proceedings consistent with this Order.
SO ORDERED on September 9, 2021.
s/Mark E. Walker
Chief United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?