MUHAMMAD v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

Filing 99

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 92 ) is ADOPTED and incorporated into this order of the court. Plaintiff's motion to str ike (ECF No. 89 ) is DENIED. Defendants motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 61 ) is GRANTED. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Boyce Turner are DISMISSED with prejudice." The clerk shall close the case. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 7/3/24. (sjb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION AKEEM MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. 4:22cv467–WS/MAF BOYCE TURNER, Defendant. ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF 92) docketed May 15, 2024. The magistrate judge recommends that (1) Plaintiff’s motion to strike (ECF No. 89) be denied; and (2) Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 61) be granted. Plaintiff has filed lengthy objections (ECF No. 97) to the report and recommendation. Having reviewed the record, including Plaintiff’s many objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the undersigned has determined that the report and recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: Page 2 of 2 1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 92) is ADOPTED and incorporated into this order of the court. 2. Plaintiff’s motion to strike (ECF No. 89) is DENIED. 3. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 61) is GRANTED. 4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Boyce Turner are DISMISSED with prejudice.” 5. The clerk shall close the case. DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of July , 2024. s/ William Stafford WILLIAM STAFFORD SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?