ADKINS v. ASTRUE

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 22 Report and Recommendation. Signed by JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 12/05/2008. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiffs application for Social Security benefits is reversed and this case is remanded to the Commissioner to enter a finding of total disability and award disability benefits. The clerk shall close this case. (kdm)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION GLORIA R. ADKINS, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ____________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated October 31, 2008 (doc. 22). Each party has been furnished a copy and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 22) is CASE NO.: 5:07cv238-SPM/EMT adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Page 2 of 2 Commissioner to deny Plaintiff's application for Social Security benefits is reversed and this case is remanded to the Commissioner to enter a finding of total disability and award disability benefits. 3. The clerk shall close this case. DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of December, 2008. s/ Stephan P. Mickle Stephan P. Mickle United States District Judge CASE NO.: 5:07cv238-SPM/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?