RIVERS v. ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY

Filing 84

ORDER adopting 81 Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 63 Motion to Enforce Judgment; granting 45 Motion for Summary Judgment.The clerk is directed to enter judgment in the amount of $8,087.29 in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. The clerk is directed to enter summary judgment in favor of Defendant Asplundh Tree Expert Company. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 9/23/09. (jem)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION ANGELO PECELLO RIVERS, Plaintiff, vs. ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY, Defendant. __________________________________/ ORDER Before me is the Magistrate Judge's Order, Report and Recommendation (Doc. 81). Plaintiff has not filed objections. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Order, Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. Defendant's Motion For Enforcement Of Sanctions (Doc. 63) is granted in part and denied in part: (a) The motion is granted to the extent that Plaintiff shall pay the amount of $1,779.10 in sanctions previously assessed as well as the additional amount of $6,308.19 as new sanctions as set forth in the Order, Report and Recommendation (Doc. 81), for a total of $8,087.29. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in the amount of $8,087.29 in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. (b) Defendant's Motion For Enforcement Of Sanctions (Doc. 63) is CASE NO. 5:08cv61/RS-EMT denied in all other respects. 3. Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. 45) is granted. The clerk is directed to enter summary judgment in favor of Defendant Asplundh Tree Expert Company. 4. The clerk is directed to close the file. ORDERED on September 23, 2009. /S/ Richard Smoak RICHARD SMOAK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?