ABNEY v. MCNEIL

Filing 65

ORDER adopting the Chief Magistrate Judge's 56 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment (doc. 48 ) is DENIED. Petitioner's Motion to Stay Proceeding and Expand Record (doc. 62 ), Amended Leave of Court and Expand Record (doc. 63 ), and Motion for Appointment of Counsel (doc. 64) are DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/29/2014. (MB)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION OTHA L. ABNEY, Petitioner, Case No. 5:08cv307/MCR/EMT MICHAEL D. CREWS, Respondent. __________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated July 18, 2014 (doc. 56). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto timely filed, the Court has determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. Petitioner’s Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment (doc. 48) is DENIED. 3. Petitioner’s Motion to Stay Proceeding and Expand Record (doc. 62), Amended Leave of Court and Expand Record (doc. 63), and Motion for Appointment of Counsel (doc. 64) are DENIED. 4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of December, 2014. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?