TOULOU v. FRY

Filing 65

ORDER re 63 MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by VIRGINIA TOULOU - - The motion shall remain in the electronic file, but the court will not consider it until the above-noted deficiency has been corrected through the filing of a memorandum in support of the motion. - - (Memorandum in Support due by 11/27/2009. ) - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on November 13, 2009. (cbj)

FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
VIRGNIIA TOULOU vs KEITH W. FRY d/b/a PELICAN POINT INTERIORS Case No. 5:08cv330/RS/EMT

ORDER Plaintiff's MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY, filed electronically on November 11, 2009 (Doc. 63), was referred to the undersigned with the following deficiency: Plaintiff failed to file a memorandum with citation of authorities in support of the motion, as required by Rule 7.1(A) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of Florida. For this reason, it is ORDERED that: The motion shall remain in the electronic file, but the court will not consider it until the above-noted deficiency has been corrected through the filing of a memorandum in support of the motion.1 DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of November 2009. /s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Failure to file a memorandum within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the date of docketing of this order will result in a denial of Plaintiff's motion.

1