MOORE v. NORTH AMERICA SPORTS INC ET AL
Filing
320
ORDER that Dfts shall identify with specificity any deficiency in Plas Response to Dfts Request For Production not later than 10/29/2010. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 10/25/2010. (sea)
MOORE v. NORTH AMERICA SPORTS INC ET AL
Doc. 320
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
BRIAN MOORE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Bernard P. Rice, Deceased, Plaintiff, vs. NORTH AMERICA SPORTS, INC., a foreign corporation d/b/a WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION d/b/a IRONMAN TRIATHLON d/b/a FORD IRONMAN FLORIDA d/b/a IRONMAN NORTH AMERICA; USA TRIATHLON, a foreign company; WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, d/b/a IRONMAN TRIATHLON a/k/a FORD IRONMAN FLORIDA, Defendants. ___________________________________________/ ORDER The Order (Doc. 318) directed Defendant to "...address whether the motion to compel has been rendered moot by the discovery Plaintiff has provided." Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 319) requests that the court "(1) Reserve jurisdiction over Defendants' Motion to Compel so Defendants may address any deficiency in Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Request for Production;" To properly comply with the Order (Doc. 318), Defendants should have identified any deficiencies in their Reply (Doc. 319). CASE NO. 5:08cv343/RS-MD
Dockets.Justia.com
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall identify with specificity any deficiency in Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Request For Production not later than October 29, 2010.
ORDERED on October 25, 2010.
/S/ Richard Smoak RICHARD SMOAK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?