HIERRO v MCDONALD, et al
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING 40 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint (twenty-five) days filed by DANIEL CHERRY, CELESTE MCDONALD. CELESTE MCDONALD answer due 12/13/2009; DANIEL CHERRY answer due 12/13/2009. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 11/18/2009. (jws)
<![CDATA[
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
MANUEL HIERRO, Plaintiff, vs. CELESTE MCDONALD, et al, Defendants. / ORDER Presently before the Court in the above entitled action is Defendants McDonald and Cherry's Second Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. (Doc. 40). Having considered said motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be GRANTED, and these defendants shall have through December 13, 2009, to respond to the complaint. DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2009. CASE NO. 5:09CV68-RS/AK
s/ A. KORNBLUM ALLAN KORNBLUM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
