NIEBLA v. BROWN

Filing 4

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by JORGE L NIEBLA : It is recommended the case be DISMISSED with prejudice - R&R flag set; signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 7/2/09 - Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 7/30/2009. (tss)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION JORGE NIEBLA, Plaintiff, vs. C. O. BROWN, et al, Defendants. / REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, an inmate incarcerated within the Florida Department of Corrections, has filed a complaint alleging that a number of corrections officers are talking negatively about him and probably conspiring to set him up. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff has not filed the appropriate motions and other papers for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915: . . . if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 5:09CV220-RS/AK Page 2 of 2 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff has had three or more prior prisoner actions dismissed on the grounds that they failed to state a claim: Case nos. 8:01CV914/TBM; 8:01CV143/TGW, and 8:00CV2306/JSM. Case nos. 3:05CV230-RV/MD, 4:05CV235-MP/AK, and 4:05CV275MP/AK were dismissed for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has also been identified as a "three striker" in the Southern District. See Case Nos. 0:02CV60676; 9:02CV81055; and 1:01CV4326. See also Case No. 4:05cv242 (case dismissed without leave to proceed because Plaintiff failed to allege an imminent danger and he has already been listed as a three striker). The instant complaint has been reviewed and it has been determined that Plaintiff has not alleged the "imminent danger" exception cited supra. Thus, because Plaintiff has had at least three prior dismissals and does not allege imminent danger of serious physical injury, this case should be summarily dismissed without further order. In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED with prejudice. IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 2nd day of July, 2009. s/ A. KORNBLUM ALLAN KORNBLUM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE NOTICE TO THE PARTIES A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations. 5:09CV220-RS/AK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?