SITSLER v. WARDEN

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING the magistrate judge's 6 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiffs failure to comply with an order of the court. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 3/17/2010. (djb)

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION J. SITSLER, Plaintiff, vs. W ARDEN FCI MARIANNA, Defendant. / ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 12, 2010 (Doc. 6). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and Case No. 5:09cv386/MCR/EMT

incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply

with an order of the court. DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of March, 2010.

s/

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE