Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that case be dismissed without prejudice as an abuse of the judicial process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 3/18/10. (tss)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION ROBERT GIBSON, Plaintiff, vs. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 7). Plaintiff has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff filed an objection (doc. 9). Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have conducted a de novo review of the sections of the report to which objections have been made. I find that the Report and Recommendation is correct and should be adopted. A review of the record reveals that Plaintiff has an evident pattern of filing frivolous lawsuits, as well as a history of dishonesty with the Courts regarding the number of cases he has previously filed. The Court finds that, given the number of prior cases that the Plaintiff failed to disclose in the complaint form, the CASE NO. 5:10-cv-37-SPM/MD Plaintiff's lack of candor was not merely the result of an oversight. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 7) is adopted and incorporated by reference into this order. 2. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice as an abuse of the judicial process. The Clerk of Court shall note on the docket that this cause was dismissed as malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). DONE AND ORDERED this eighteenth day of March, 2010. s/ Stephan P. Mickle Stephan P. Mickle Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?