PORTER v. DOUGLAS, et al

Filing 54

ORDER adopting 52 Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Simmons, Durrance and Tyus are DROPPED as parties to this case because of Plaintiffs failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The case remains open pending further proceedings against Defendants Lee,Dudley, and Baxter. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 3/2/2012. (jem)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
DWIGHT J. PORTER,
Plaintiff,
vs.

CASE NO. 5:10-cv-206/RS-GRJ

COLONEL BAXTER, et al.,
Defendants.
_________________________________________ /
ORDER
U

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 52).
Defendants Colonel Baxter, Captain Lee, and Assistant Warden Dudley filed objections.
(See Doc. 53). I have considered those objections de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated
by reference in this Order.
2. Defendants Simmons and Durance’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 40) is GRANTED.
3. Defendant Lee’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 40) is DENIED.
4. Defendant Tyus’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 48) is GRANTED.
5. Defendant Baxter’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 48) is DENIED.
6. Defendants Simmons, Durrance and Tyus are DROPPED as parties to this case
because of Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

7. The case remains open pending further proceedings against Defendants Lee,
Dudley, and Baxter.

ORDERED on March 2, 2012.
/S/ Richard Smoak
RICHARD SMOAK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE