REED v. MCNEIL
ORDER re 5 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by LOUIS REED, JR - - Clerk to furnish copies of amended petition along with a copy of this order to respondent and the AttyGen/FL. - Respondent shall have ninety (90) d ays from date this order is entered of docket in which to file an answer as directed. - - (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 1/31/2011. ) - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on November 1, 2010. (cbj) Modified on 11/1/2010 - (cc: MCNEIL R/R# 7008 1300 0001 8566 0438; MCCOLLUM R/R# 7008 1300 0001 8566 0421) (cbj).
-MD REED v. MCNEIL, ET AL
Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION LOUIS REED, JR., Petitioner, vs. CASE NO.: 5:10cv264/SPM/MD
W ALTER A. MCNEIL, et al., Respondents. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER Petitioner has filed an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 5) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appropriate number of service copies have been filed with the court, and petitioner has paid the filing fee. Respondent will be required to file an answer so the court may determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required or, if not required, may dispose of the petition as justice requires. Rule 8(a), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. The answer shall be filed pursuant to § 2254 Rule 5 and shall be styled as an answer rather than as a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, unless it appears to the respondent that a motion to dismiss based on a procedural defect such as failure to exhaust or the statute of limitations is appropriate. McBride v. Sharpe, 25 F.3d 962, 970 (11th Cir. 1994). As provided by Rule 5, the answer shall respond to the allegations of the petition; state whether any claim in the petition is barred; attach such portions of the transcripts as the answering party deems relevant; and attach copies of state appellate court briefs and opinions. See Rule 5(b)-(d), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254.1 If respondent's answer requires the submission of materials outside the state court record,
A ll exhibits shall be filed electronically. If the exhibits exceed 200 pages in length, respondent shall a ls o provide a courtesy copy in paper form a t. The exhibits are part of the answer. Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(c); see a ls o Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Therefore, respondent is required to serve a copy of the exhibits upon petitioner. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a).
Page 2 of 3
he shall file a motion to expand the record pursuant to Rule 7. See Rule 7, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. If respondent raises the defense of failure to exhaust as to any claim, he may file an appropriate motion and shall set forth as to each such claim the appropriate manner of raising the claim under Florida law, whether petitioner has sought such relief, and, if not, what further relief is available for purposes of §2254(c). Rule 5, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254; 28 U.S.C. §2254(b) and (c). If further relief is not available in the state courts, the appropriate defense is procedural default (not failure to exhaust), which should be asserted in respondent's answer (not in a motion to dismiss). If an exhaustion argument is raised by motion, respondent may await a ruling on that defense before filing an answer on the merits. Alternatively, respondent may proceed directly to the merits. See § 2254 (b)(2) (the application may be denied on the merits notwithstanding the failure to exhaust state remedies) and § 2254(b)(3) (the exhaustion requirement is not deemed to be waived unless expressly waived by counsel for the state), as amended April 24, 1996. The answer shall be filed within ninety (90) days from the date this order is docketed. Thereafter, petitioner will be given the opportunity to file a reply. Upon receipt of the answer and the petitioner's reply, the court will review the file to determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required. An evidentiary hearing will not be required unless consideration of disputed evidence outside the state court record appears necessary to the court. If it is determined that an evidentiary hearing is not required, the court will make such disposition of the petition as justice requires pursuant to §2254 Rule 8(a). Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Clerk is directed to furnish copies of the amended petition (to include any
attachments to said petition) along with a copy of this order to respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida.
Case No: 5:10cv264/SPM/MD
Page 3 of 3
Respondent shall have ninety (90) days from the date this order is entered
on the docket in which to file an answer as directed by this order. DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of November, 2010.
MILES DAVIS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case No: 5:10cv264/SPM/MD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?