BURGESS v. AUGUSTINE

Filing 17

ORDER ON 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A), reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's denial of Pet's Motion for Sanctions 10 is denied because Petition has not shown that the Magis trate Judge's Order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 8 U.S.C § 2241 4 is denied & is dismissed w/o prejudice. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 7/18/2011. (sea)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR., Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-64/RS-CJK PAIGE AUGESTINE, Warden of Marianna FCI, Defendant. _________________________________________/ ORDER U Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) and Petitioner’s Notice of Appeal to Denial of Motion for Sanctions; Objection to R&R of the Magistrate (Doc. 16). I have considered Petitioner’s objections de novo. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A), reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s denial of Petitioner’s Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 10) is denied because Petition has not shown that the Magistrate Judge’s Order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 2. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 8 U.S.C § 2241 (Doc. 4) is denied and is dismissed without prejudice. 3. The clerk is directed to close the file. ORDERED on July 18, 2011. /S/ Richard Smoak RICHARD SMOAK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?