MARTS v. YU et al

Filing 7

ORDER ON 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Adopting R&R - Plaintiffs 1 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice as malicious, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). The dismissal of this case shall count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/5/2011. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION SIDNEY MARTS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 5:11cv285-MP/EMT ALBERT YU, et al., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 30, 2011. (Doc. 4). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice as malicious, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). The dismissal of this case shall count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of December, 2011. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?