HAWES v. ASTRUE
ORDER ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income is AFFIRMED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 3/25/2013. (jws)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00337-MP-CAS
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated February 19, 2013. (Doc. 14). The parties have been furnished a copy
of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has
passed, and none have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely
filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated
by reference in this order.
The final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security denying
plaintiff’s applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant
to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted for Michael
J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the
last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Page 2 of 2
Security Income is AFFIRMED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of March, 2013
s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case No: 5:11-cv-00337-MP-CAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?