Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income is AFFIRMED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 3/25/2013. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION MELANIE HAWES, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00337-MP-CAS CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Defendant. _____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 19, 2013. (Doc. 14). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff’s applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental 1 Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Page 2 of 2 Security Income is AFFIRMED. DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of March, 2013 s/Maurice M. Paul Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge Case No: 5:11-cv-00337-MP-CAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?