MARTIKEAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al

Filing 70

ORDER adopting 68 Report and Recommendation; granting 49 , 63 Motions to Dismiss. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 8/26/2014. The claims against Defendants Abad and Guzman are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The Clerk is directed to close the file. (kdm)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION GLENN L. MARTIKEAN, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00343-MP-CJK DR. A. GUZMAN, M.D., Clinical Director, and EDEN ABAD, MidLevel Practitioner, Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 7, 2014. (Doc. 68). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed objections at Doc. 69. I have made a de novo review based on those objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 68) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Defendants’ motions to dismiss (docs. 49, 63) are GRANTED. 3. The claims against Defendants Abad and Guzman are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Page 2 of 2 4. The Clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of August, 2014 s/Maurice M. Paul Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge Case No: 5:11-cv-00343-MP-CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?