WILLIAMS v. CULPEPPER
Filing
47
ORDER ADOPTING 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - all claims against defendant Culpepper are DISMISSED, official capacity claims against defendant Sinclair are DISMISSED, and the only claims remaining are the individual capacity claims against defendants Simmons and Sinclair; signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 3/27/13. (tss)
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
HENRY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00378-MP-GRJ
CULPEPPER, SIMMONS, SINCLAIR,
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated December 28, 2012. (Doc. 43). The parties have been furnished a copy
of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has
passed, and none have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report
and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated
by reference in this order.
2.
Defendant Culpepper’s and Sinclair’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18) is GRANTED
in part and DENIED in part. All of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant
Culpepper are DISMISSED. Plaintiff’s official capacity claims against
Defendant Sinclair are DISMISSED. The only claims remaining in this case are
the individual capacity claims against Defendants Simmons and Sinclair. .
DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of March, 2013
s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?