FODOR v. EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP
Filing
162
ORDER ADOPTING 160 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ; denying as moot 102 Motion to Dismiss; granting 137 Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiff on all claims. The $5,218.89 discovery sanction imposed against Plaintiff in favor of Defendant shall be reduced to judgment. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 4/15/2014. (jcw)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
FERENC FODOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-28-RS-CJK
EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP,
Defendant.
_________________________________________/
ORDER
Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.
160) and Plaintiff’s Responses and Objections to Report and Recommendations
(Doc. 161). I have reviewed the objection de novo.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved
and incorporated in this Order.
2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 137) is
GRANTED.
3. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 102) for Plaintiff’s failure to
comply with the court’s August 30, 2013 discovery order is
DENIED as moot in light of Defendant’s notice of Plaintiff’s
Page 2 of 2
compliance (Doc. 134) and in light of this Court’s entry of
summary judgment in Defendant’s favor on the merits.
4. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 102) for Plaintiff’s failure to
obey the discovery order requiring Plaintiff to pay a discovery
sanction be DENIED as moot in light of this Court’s entry of
summary judgment in defendant’s favor on the merits.
5. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant and against the
Plaintiff on all claims.
6. The $5,218.89 discovery sanction imposed against Plaintiff in
favor of Defendant shall be reduced to judgment.
ORDERED on April 15, 2014.
/s/ Richard Smoak
RICHARD SMOAK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?