GOULD v. GILO et al.

Filing 54

ORDER ADOPTING 48 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Case is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Clerk directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 7/28/2014. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION DANIEL J. GOULD, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00185-MP-CJK DR. N.B. GILO, et al., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 6, 2014. (Doc. 48). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed objections at Doc. 53. I have made a de novo review based on those objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 48) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Page 2 of 2 3. The Clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of July, 2014 s/Maurice M. Paul Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge Case No: 5:12-cv-00185-MP-CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?