GOULD v. GILO et al.
ORDER ADOPTING 48 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Case is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Clerk directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 7/28/2014. (jws)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
DANIEL J. GOULD,
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00185-MP-CJK
DR. N.B. GILO, et al.,
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated May 6, 2014. (Doc. 48). The parties have been furnished a copy of the
Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant
to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed objections at Doc. 53. I
have made a de novo review based on those objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections, I
have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 48) is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
Page 2 of 2
The Clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this
28th day of July, 2014
s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case No: 5:12-cv-00185-MP-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?