SCHMIDT v. TUCKER
Filing
79
ORDER: 59 , 73 Orders are VACATED, and Magistrate Judge directed to issue an order on those issues which explains the reasons for denying petitioner's motions. If petitioner disagrees with that order, he must again file objections. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 1/15/2013. (jws)
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
DAN SCHMIDT,
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00226-MP-EMT
MICHAEL D CREWS, et al.,
Respondents.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Docs. 71 and 77, in which petitioner objects to the
Magistrate Judge's orders at Docs. 59 and 73. Both orders were entered on "Referral & Order"
forms and thus do not contain the Magistrate Judge's reasoning. In order to allow the
undersigned to consider the objections, the orders at Doc. 59 and 73 are vacated, and the
Magistrate Judge is directed to issue an order on those issues which explains the reasons for
denying petitioner's motions. If the petitioner disagrees with that order, he must again file
objections.
DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of January, 2013
s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?