COULLIETTE v. TUCKER

Filing 8

ORDER re 7 MOTION to Amend 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by DANIEL M COULLIETTE is GRANTED. Clerk shall send Petitioner a blank 28 U.S.C. §2254 petition form for state prisoners. Petitioner must file orig inal Amended Petition w/two identical service copies. Deadline for Respondent to submit a response remains 3/3/2013. (Amended Pleadings due by 2/12/2013.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 1/23/2013. (jws)(Form provided as noted in Order.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION DANIEL M. COULLIETTE, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 5:12-cv-355-RS-GRJ SECRETARY, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. _____________________________/ ORDER This case is before the Court on Doc. 7, Petitioner’s Motion to Amend Current Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Adding an Additional Ground. Petitioner states that he wishes to add a sixth claim of relief to his pending petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Upon due consideration, the Court finds that the motion to amend is due to be granted. However, Petitioner will be required to file a complete First Amended Petition, that includes all six grounds for relief, on the Court’s form. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Petitioner’s Motion to Amend Current Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Adding an Additional Ground, Doc. 7, is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk shall send Petitioner a blank 28 U.S.C § 2254 petition form for state prisoners. 3. Petitioner must file his original Amended Petition, which shall include all six grounds for relief, together with two identical service copies, on or before February 12, 2013. 4. The deadline for Respondent to submit a response to the petition remains March 3, 2013. DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of January 2013. s/Gary R. Jones GARY R. JONES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?