WILLIAMS v. TUCKER, et al

Filing 117

ORDER ADOPTING 113 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ; granting in part and denying in part 94 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 99 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/6/2015. (jcw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION QUINCY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 5:13-cv-9-RS-GRJ KENNETH TUCKER, et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 113). I have reviewed the report and recommendation de novo. I have also reviewed Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. 116). Although Plaintiff has stated his reasons for objecting to at least 11 of the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions, I reject Plaintiff’s arguments as not compelling and agree instead with the well-reasoned report of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order. 2. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. 94) is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART. The motion is denied as to (i) Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Harrell for pepper spraying, (ii) Plaintiff’s claim against Defendants Harrell and Rickman for leaving Plaintiff in a contaminated cell overnight, and (iii) Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant 1 Barfield for failing to intervene. All other claims against Defendants Gunn, Howell and Crews are dismissed. 3. Defendant Knollinger’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Doc. 99) is GRANTED. Defendant Knollinger is dismissed from this action. 4. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones for further proceedings. ORDERED on January 6, 2015. /s/ Richard Smoak RICHARD SMOAK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?