PATTERSON v. CREWS
Filing
24
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 23 Report and Recommendation. Respondent's 18 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, challenging petitioner's judgment of conviction a nd sentence in State of Florida v. Anthony Patterson in the Circuit Court for Calhoun County, Florida, Case No. 07-0101, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 5/1/2014. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
ANTHONY J. PATTERSON,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 5:13cv51/RV/CJK
MICHAEL CREWS,
Respondent.
_________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated April 1, 2014. (Doc. 23). The parties have been furnished a
copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to
file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No
objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the
Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 23) is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 18) is GRANTED.
Page 2 of 2
3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging petitioner’s
judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Anthony Patterson in the
Circuit Court for Calhoun County, Florida, Case No. 07-0101, is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
4. The clerk is directed to close the file.
5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of May, 2014.
/s/ Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 5:13cv51/RV/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?