BALDWIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Construed as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Petitioner's Motion (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice as an unauthorized or suc cessive § 2255 motion. Construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Petitioner's Motion (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice because Petitioner has not demonstrated entitlement to proceed under that section. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 4/30/2013. (jcw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION TERRY BALDWIN, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 5:13-cv-86-RS-CJK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. _________________________________/ ORDER Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Order and Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4). No objections have been filed. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order. 2. Construed as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Petitioner’s Motion (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice as an unauthorized or successive § 2255 motion. 3. Construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Petitioner’s Motion (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice because Petitioner has not demonstrated entitlement to proceed under that section. 4. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). 5. The Clerk is directed to close the case. ORDERED on April 30, 2013. /S/ Richard Smoak RICHARD SMOAK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?