NEWELL v. OVERSTREET

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the Younger v. Harris abstention doctrine. 402 U.S. 37(1971). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 11/26/2013. (jws)

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
DAVID VAUN NEWELL,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. 5:13-cv-00173-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL C. OVERSTREET,
Defendant.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated October 25, 2013. (Doc. 4). The parties have been furnished a copy of
the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The plaintiff has not objected to the
Report Recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely
filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.

The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated
by reference in this order.

2.

This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the Younger v. Harris
abstention doctrine. 401 U.S. 37 (1971).

DONE AND ORDERED this

26th day of November, 2013

s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge