TAYLOR v. CREWS

Filing 27

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 24 Report and Recommendation. Respondent's 17 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Petitioner's 4 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). A ceritificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 7/21/2014. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION JOHN HENRY TAYLOR, JR., Petitioner, vs. Case No.: 5:13cv243/LAC/EMT MICHAEL D. CREWS, Respondent. ___________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated June 26, 2014 (doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 17) is GRANTED. 3. Petitioner’s amended habeas petition (doc. 4) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). 4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED on this 21st day of July, 2014. s/L.A. Collier Lacey A. Collier Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?