HOPE v. WALKER
Filing
59
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION : The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 53 ) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order. The defendant's motion (doc. 37 ) to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is GRANTED. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED." Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 9/4/2015. (dac)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER E. HOPE, SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
5:13cv362-WS
WILLIE WALKER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation
docketed August 18, 2015. See Doc. 53. The magistrate judge recommends that
the defendant's motion for failure to exhaust administrative remedies be granted.
The plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 58) to the magistrate judge's report and
recommendation.
Having considered the record in light of the plaintiff’s objections, the court
finds that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted.
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 53) is hereby
ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.
2. The defendant's motion (doc. 37) to dismiss for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies is GRANTED.
3. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED."
DONE AND ORDERED this
4th
day of
September
, 2015.
s/ William Stafford
WILLIAM STAFFORD
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?