DANIEL GOULD V. WILLIAM CHURCHWELL et al
Filing
99
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 95 ) is ADOPTED and incorporated into this order by reference. The defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. 88 ) is GRANTED. The plaintiff' s third amended complaint (doc. 60 ) and this action are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED with prejudice." All pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 6/6/2017. (cle)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
DANIEL GOULD,
Plaintiff,
v.
5:13cv386–WS/CJK
WILLIAM CHURCHWELL,
et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.
95) docketed April 13, 2017. The magistrate judge recommends that the
defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 88) be granted and that the plaintiff’s action
be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The plaintiff has filed
objections (doc. 98) to the report and recommendation.
Having considered the record in light of the plaintiff’s objections, the court
finds that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
Page 2 of 2
1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 95) is
ADOPTED and incorporated into this order by reference.
2. The defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 88) is GRANTED.
3. The plaintiff’s third amended complaint (doc. 60) and this action are
DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “All claims are DISMISSED
with prejudice.”
5. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
DONE AND ORDERED this
6th
day of
June
, 2017.
s/ William Stafford
WILLIAM STAFFORD
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?