SEXTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Samuels, Holder, and Maldanado are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim u pon which relief may be granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Plaintiffs claims against the United States is DISMISSED with prejudice for seeking monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 6/23/2014. (jcw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
KEITH JAMES SEXTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 5:14-cv-38-RS-GRJ
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
Defendants.
_________________________________________/
ORDER
Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15). There are
no objections filed. I have reviewed the report de novo.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and
incorporated in this Order.
2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Plaintiff’s claims against
Defendants Samuels, Holder, and Maldanado are DISMISSED without
prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Plaintiff’s claims against the United
States is DISMISSED with prejudice for seeking monetary relief from a
defendant who is immune from such relief.
ORDERED on June 23, 2014.
/s/ Richard Smoak
RICHARD SMOAK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?