SEXTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Samuels, Holder, and Maldanado are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim u pon which relief may be granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Plaintiffs claims against the United States is DISMISSED with prejudice for seeking monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 6/23/2014. (jcw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION KEITH JAMES SEXTON, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 5:14-cv-38-RS-GRJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. _________________________________________/ ORDER Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15). There are no objections filed. I have reviewed the report de novo. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order. 2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Samuels, Holder, and Maldanado are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Plaintiff’s claims against the United States is DISMISSED with prejudice for seeking monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. ORDERED on June 23, 2014. /s/ Richard Smoak RICHARD SMOAK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?