BELL v. PAULIN

Filing 5

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 4 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B) as malicious for plaintiffs abuse of the judicial process and, alternatively, for plaintiffs failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 9/23/2014. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION RICHARD LEWIS BELL, SR., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 5:14cv191/RV/CJK R. P. TIFFT PAULIN, Defendant. __________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated August 22, 2014. (Doc. 4). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of the court. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 4) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B) as malicious for plaintiff’s abuse of the judicial process and, alternatively, for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Page 2 of 2 3. The clerk is directed to close the file. ORDERED on this 23rd day of September, 2014. /s/ Roger Vinson ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 5:14cv191/RV/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?