BELL v. PAULIN
Filing
5
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 4 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B) as malicious for plaintiffs abuse of the judicial process and, alternatively, for plaintiffs failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 9/23/2014. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
RICHARD LEWIS BELL, SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 5:14cv191/RV/CJK
R. P. TIFFT PAULIN,
Defendant.
__________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated August 22, 2014. (Doc. 4). The parties have been furnished
a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to
file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No
objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the
Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of the court.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 4) is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C.
§1915(e)(2)(B) as malicious for plaintiff’s abuse of the judicial process and,
alternatively, for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Page 2 of 2
3. The clerk is directed to close the file.
ORDERED on this 23rd day of September, 2014.
/s/ Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 5:14cv191/RV/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?