SEWELL v. COLVIN
ORDER adopting the chief magistrate judge's 23 Report and Recommendation. Re: 21 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff shall recover fees in the amount of $2,966.72, for time expended by his counsel in representing him before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 11/4/2015. (djb)
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
LARRY GENE SEWELL,
Case No.: 5:14cv321/RV/EMT
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of the Social Security
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated October 6, 2015 (doc. 23). The parties have been furnished a copy of the
Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to
Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and
Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
Plaintiff shall recover fees in the amount of $2,966.72, for time expended by his
counsel in representing him before the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA). The fee award is subject to an offset to satisfy any
qualifying outstanding debt that Plaintiff may owe to the United States.
If Plaintiff receives all or any portion of the EAJA fee award, it shall be mailed to him
in care of his attorney, Walter Allen Blakeney, Brock & Stout, LLC, P.O. Drawer 311167,
Enterprise, AL 36331-1167.
DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of November, 2015.
/s/ Roger Vinson
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?